There is just so much ‘status quo’ with big executives these days (and believe me I have dealt with many in an out-of-work type environment) that they often forget to learn and integrate a new model of ‘thinking’ as they are too ‘attached’ to their archaic modes of wisdom.
One of the key approaches to modern wisdom comes through various interpolations, juxtapositions and paradoxicals which serendipitously carve our ‘conscious’ mode that drives our ‘actions’.
So, with that said; its important to understand that despite the prevalence of a lot of archaic models in contemporary society; not all of them are useful for a meta-understanding of the economic and socioeconomic situations that plague us in everyday life (povety, unemployment and most of all – financial uncertainty)
For starters, let’s take a deep and insightful journey into the models put forward by Kurt Lewin – who was known as “one of the modern pioneers of social, organizational and applied psychology”.
Lewin proposes that the study of sociology can teach us powerful lessons in personal change; which is especially required for big executives in large corporations which still follow a strict chain of command and classic management style organisational design (for they can never be nudged with your new found epiphanies).
In his prognosis, Lewin devises a systematic framework (known as ‘force field analysis’) which prompts us to look at specific forces driving a required change (helping forces) and its diametric opposite (hindering forces). The principals behind this model are very useful (wasn’t it Einstein who said “not all models are good but some are useful”?). In this light, its relevant that Lewin’s ideas get resurrected in the context of Network Economies in order to create positive outcomes by analysing situations.
In these situations; Lewin describes that the field or domain of change (its ‘life space’) is highly contingent on “that individuals internalization of external stimuli”; for e.g. physical and social dimensions that are often ‘regressed’ through inferring a sample space of certain behavioural traits (group conflict, learning, adolescence, hatred and morale). In this context, Lewins “Force Field Analysis” model is also very easily depicted diagrammatically through simple arrows and words that validate the use of this model in various situations.
Many mathematicians and Econometric Statisticians will generally agree that Lewin was definitely a prodigy thinker – for he only shed light on various misconceptions that are often persistent in various social systems.
Lewin applied these principals in many of his works most of his life and although he wasn’t acquainted with the model of ‘experiential learning’ at that time; he did shed light into a model which will definitely be useful for change management in the context of strategic management and change.
Experiential Learning is really the output of Lewin’s model in a modern day context for it is only through this process that one can really ‘manage’ the various ‘organisational/social/interpersonal’ tensions that persist day to day relationship management (especially with people who don’t really embrace you for your potential).
To put this diagrammatically, I thank Ken Thompson; author of the BIOTEAMS blog for creating an excellent graphical manifest that flows in with the ‘natural tempo’ of Bioteaming from the inside-out (below)
So to sum up this short and brief insight article; its relevant to understand that although many models that exist in accounting, finance and economics are rooted in archaic theory; NOT all of them are useful in the ever evolving complex system (or complexity adaptive system) context. To really get insight into which models are useful, there is a dire need to reconcile “old” models of thinking with “emergent” models which focuses its delineation on properties of the system in which one is operating (or its domain in this case).